We use cookies. Privacy choices

    Skip to content

    Live webinar Nov 5: save your seat

    Use case · GraphRAG

    What is GraphRAG? How it works and when to use it

    GraphRAG is retrieval-augmented generation that pulls context from a knowledge graph instead of only from text chunks that look similar. It follows typed relationships between entities, so answers can cross several facts and cite where each one came from.

    Definition

    What is GraphRAG?

    Traditional RAG feeds an LLM the text chunks that look most similar to a prompt and asks it to synthesize an answer. The model fills in what it can’t find — that’s the hallucination tax.

    GraphRAG replaces the lookup. Instead of retrieving by embedding similarity, it traverses explicit entity relationships in your knowledge graph. The path from question to answer is declared, not inferred — across structured systems, unstructured content, and world knowledge alike.

    Decentralized GraphRAG with Fluree pushes enterprise accuracy past 95%, with cited answers, row-level governance, and no vector index to keep fresh.

    Why GraphRAG Wins

    Six reasons graph traversal beats fuzzy similarity.

    Traverse explicit paths, not guess at similarity

    GraphRAG follows typed relationships through your knowledge graph — the exact path from entity to entity to entity. Vector RAG retrieves chunks that look similar and asks the model to fill the gaps.

    • “What projects has Alice worked on with people who reported to Bob?” is one traversal
    • Accuracy stays stable as entity count grows; vector-only systems degrade
    • Deterministic paths → deterministic answers
    Two meanings

    Which GraphRAG do people mean?

    The word covers two different builds. They solve different problems, so it helps to know which one you are evaluating.

    A graph generated from documents

    An LLM reads your text, extracts entities and relationships, groups them into communities, and writes summaries to search. This is the pattern from the 2024 paper behind Microsoft GraphRAG. It suits broad questions across a document set. Its README warns that indexing can be expensive and says the project is largely in maintenance mode.

    A governed graph of your business

    Entities come from your systems and documents, modeled against an ontology, with policy on every fact. Retrieval runs queries against that graph. It suits questions that need exact joins, access control, and an audit trail. This is what Fluree builds, and it takes more modeling up front than pointing an LLM at a folder.

    Beyond Accuracy

    Three pillars the enterprise can’t ship without.

    Accuracy is the headline. Connectivity, verifiability, and embedded governance are what make GraphRAG production-ready across finance, healthcare, legal, and operations.

    Universal Connectivity

    Every system. One retrieval surface.

    Why we can
    • Connects databases, SaaS, files, and content in place — no rip-and-replace integration.
    • One semantic view across every source so retrieval reaches the whole business at once.

    Why they can't

    Vector pipelines see only the text they’ve been fed. When the answer lives across CRM, billing, product, and support systems, fragmented embeddings leave the model guessing at joins that were never expressed.

    100% Verifiable Accuracy

    Trace every answer to the row it came from.

    Why we can
    • Every answer carries its source — systems queried, records retrieved, relationships traversed, timestamps included.
    • In finance, healthcare, legal, and ops, explainability is not optional — it’s governance.

    Why they can't

    Vector systems return a relevance score, not a proof — no path from the answer back to its sources. Audit, compliance, and trust all break down.

    Embedded Security

    Policy enforced in the graph itself.

    Why we can
    • Every node carries its access rules — the model never sees unauthorized data.
    • Users and agents get a governed slice instead of a dangerous all-access retrieval layer.

    Why they can't

    Vector stores treat security as a downstream filter. Sensitive content leaks into shared embeddings, row-level controls disappear, and governance becomes a brittle layer of patches over a fundamentally ungoverned index.

    Side by Side

    Vector RAG vs.
    GraphRAG.

    A direct comparison of retrieval approaches across the capabilities that matter for enterprise AI deployments.

    Capability

    Traditional

    Vector RAG

    Fluree

    GraphRAG

    Retrieval basis

    Embedding similarity
    Explicit typed relationships

    Context quality

    Fragmented text chunks
    Pre-connected entity context

    Multi-source queries

    Siloed per index
    Unified across systems

    Structured data

    Bolt-on, limited
    Unified with unstructured

    Answer grounding

    Probabilistic, model-inferred
    Cited, source-provable

    Explainability

    Opaque similarity score
    Full query path + citations

    Determinism

    Non-deterministic
    Deterministic traversal

    Hallucination risk

    High — model fills gaps
    Low: answers come from graph queries, with citations

    Enterprise accuracy

    Varies, with no lineage to check an answer
    95%+ in Fluree’s 2024 study

    Weighing vector databases for RAG? See seven vector search options compared — Pinecone, Qdrant, Milvus, Chroma, pgvector, Elasticsearch, and Fluree, every claim sourced.

    FAQ

    GraphRAG is retrieval-augmented generation powered by a knowledge graph. Instead of retrieving text chunks by embedding similarity, GraphRAG traverses typed relationships in a governed graph to return deterministic, cited context to the LLM.

    Microsoft GraphRAG is an MIT-licensed research project that uses an LLM to extract a knowledge graph from raw text, cluster it into communities, and summarize them for search. Its README says the project is largely in maintenance mode and that the code is a demonstration, not an officially supported Microsoft offering (checked October 2026).

    They are usually the same idea: RAG that retrieves from a knowledge graph. Some people use GraphRAG for the specific pattern of generating a graph from documents with an LLM, and knowledge graph RAG for retrieving from a curated, governed graph that also covers structured data.

    Vector RAG retrieves chunks that look similar to a query. GraphRAG follows explicit relationships. Vector RAG degrades sharply on multi-hop queries and hallucinates when the evidence isn’t contiguous; GraphRAG stays stable because the path between entities is declared, not inferred.

    Yes. Most production deployments combine graph traversal with vector search over unstructured content — the graph encodes the entities and relationships, vectors cover passage-level retrieval. Fluree orchestrates both inside one governed query.

    In Fluree’s 2024 study, GraphRAG for GenAI Accuracy, the same questions answered over raw relational tables scored 8–15% zero-shot. A governed knowledge graph started at 60–65% and reached 95%+ once enriched and joined. Your numbers depend on domain, schema quality and policy complexity.

    Yes. Fluree pulls entities and relationships from PDFs, contracts and emails (and audio and video on the Fluree Enterprise tier), then lands them in the same governed graph as your structured sources. Retrieval traverses both.

    Authorization is enforced at the data layer by attribute-based policies on entities, relationships, and properties. Every retrieval path is filtered by what the caller — human or agent — is allowed to see. No sensitive data leaks into shared embeddings.

    Fluree is built on W3C standards — RDF, SKOS, OWL, and JSON-LD — and exposes queries via MCP, HTTP, SPARQL, openCypher, GraphQL and JSON-LD. That means no lock-in: your semantic model and retrieval surface are portable.

    Fluree’s AI-assisted ontology and entity resolution collapse the timeline. Most teams move from fragmented schemas to a working GraphRAG deployment in weeks, not the multi-quarter timelines of manual ontology projects.

    Recognized by Gartner

    Gartner Cool Vendor, Cool Vendors in Data Management: GenAI Disrupts Traditional Technologies, 30 May 2024Featured in a 2024 Gartner Hype Cycle

    Gartner, “Cool Vendors in Data Management: GenAI Disrupts Traditional Technologies,” 30 May 2024. GARTNER and COOL VENDORS are registered trademarks of Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates and are used herein with permission. Gartner does not endorse any vendor, product or service depicted in its research publications.

    GraphRAG for enterprise

    Stop hallucinating. Start citing.

    Every AI answer in production should trace back to the row it came from. Fluree’s GraphRAG makes that the default — governed, deterministic, and ready for audit.

    Updated